<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do TV remote manufacturers employ infrared signaling instead of radio wave signaling?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html</link>
	<description>Download Free Medical Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wingsdjf</title>
		<link>http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html/comment-page-1#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>wingsdjf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html#comment-4888</guid>
		<description>IR is cheaper. If you make millions of devices, a few dollars cheaper, makes a big difference. Lower performance than RF is acceptable to customers, so OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IR is cheaper. If you make millions of devices, a few dollars cheaper, makes a big difference. Lower performance than RF is acceptable to customers, so OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADEEL H</title>
		<link>http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html/comment-page-1#comment-4887</link>
		<dc:creator>ADEEL H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html#comment-4887</guid>
		<description>Because infrared work, at small distance, thats why it is used and 2 what radio wave works by great distance, that could cause side effects</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because infrared work, at small distance, thats why it is used and 2 what radio wave works by great distance, that could cause side effects</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke75</title>
		<link>http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html/comment-page-1#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emedical-software.com/why-do-tv-remote-manufacturers-employ-infrared-signaling-instead-of-radio-wave-signaling.html#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered the same thing. I suspect it is because IR&#039;s all there on the same wavelength through it a great chance of interference with RF remote controls werden.Es would much easier to use if even if they do not have sight of the line-of-and you want you can use your DVD, etc in a cupboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered the same thing. I suspect it is because IR&#8217;s all there on the same wavelength through it a great chance of interference with RF remote controls werden.Es would much easier to use if even if they do not have sight of the line-of-and you want you can use your DVD, etc in a cupboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

